Am Sonntag, den 12.05.2013, 17:28 +0200 schrieb Raphael Groner: > > If I remember correctly the last time we discussed this the reason > > for leaving Java, was that it's often not really obvious what's > > missing, when something fails. So I think back then we opted for > > leaving Java on the spin and removed some application packages. > > I would perhaps rather go for a totally different target size. > > > > Johannes > > IMHO, we should work on the user experience, and not focus mainly on the > (technical) image size. As said, in case of missing java, there should > be a good user help with how to install java afterwards, if it's > *really* needed. I don't see any reason so far why it's needed for any > standard application?? > > And well, why keep java and remove firefox? I don't understand...
Because we have two browsers, but only one Java runtime. Plus (as Johannes already explained), one is obvious to install, the other not so much. Best regards, Christoph _______________________________________________ xfce mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
