That was a joke with yacpi, please don't take my kidding seriously. Sorry for the noise. :)
But xfpm needs really love. Maybe I have to rewrite sth. from scratch. Best, ~R. Am Tue, 13 May 2014 12:00:04 +0000 schrieb [email protected]: > Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 21:12:47 +0200 > From: Sven Lankes <[email protected]> > To: Raphael Groner <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Is xfce4-power-manager unmaintained? > Message-ID: <20140511191247.GD10909@killefiz> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 04:31:10PM +0200, Raphael Groner wrote: > > > since xfce4-power-manager seems to need some love from upstream > > since some months, the xfce maintainers in Fedora as well, and it > > seems to lack a persistent maintainer, I suggest to replace it in > > favor of yacpi, at least on the xfce spin media. Though, it's based > > on ncrus What do you think? > > 1st: the last yacpi release was 7 years ago > 2nd: the it doesn't manage anything - it just displays the current > acpi cpu state and battery capacity. I don't use XFCE but judging > from the name I'd guess that xfce4-power-manager does more than that. > > So I guess that the replacement is a bad idea. _______________________________________________ xfce mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
