>Before this can be supported it really requires the OS to provide some
>functionality in a _sane_ and non-hackish manner IMHO.  There are various
>"hacks" out there to accomplish this functionality, but they're just that,
>ugly hacks.  While these ugly hacks may provide useful functionality to
>some people out there, none of them solve the problem in a sane or correct
>way, and thus are unlikely to be included in any official kernel (Linux or
>otherwise) IMHO.
>
>Without the proper OS kernel support to allow multi-seat, it wont be clear
>what XFree86 enhancements/modifications will be needed (if any) until that
>OS support is present in the given OSs.  The developmental 2.5.x Linux
>kernel series should have the required functionality.
>
>Has anyone experimented with Linux 2.5.x and XFree86 4.3.0 to attempt to
set
>up multi-seat?  That would be a starting point anyway.  I'm not sure if
any
>of the BSDs have the needed functionality or not or if it is planned, but
>perhaps Anholt could comment on that.

I do a experiments. I provide "smart/ugly hacks". Results in
http://startx.times.lv

IMHO xf86 folks should not support supicious projects. My is one of
thousand Linux kernel pathes.
Nobody can test these all.

Ofcourse CPU speed now is powerfull. In the my end I run old games ("Return
to castle wolfenstein")
in the triple screens, whith separate sound. This fact impress only
funs/hackers. Office users should
wait some years or use commercial software (5-head) under MS-Windows
provided by chinese sellers.

Aivils Stoss


_______________________________________________
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86

Reply via email to