On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:06:50PM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> 
> >>I think I might have located the problem.  The server is not reporting the
> >>correct drawable in a completion event requested by an Xinerama-fied
> >>XShmPutImage request.  The attached is a possible fix for that.
> 
> > That works, but I think there's just a typo in the original
> >code that keeps it from working the way it was intended.  FOR_NSCREENS
> >should have been FOR_NSCREENS_BACKWARD.  The idea was that it
> >counts down and sends the event on the last one (index zero) which
> >had the correct drawable.  Alot of functions use the BACKWARD
> >version for this an similar reasons.
> 
> OK, thanks.

There are two instances of FOR_NSCREENS in the original code -- which one is
supposed to be changed?

And are you saying that changing FOR_NSCREENS will fix the problem alone, or
that the patch is also needed?

Thanks.
-- 
Phil Dibowitz
Systems Architect and Administrator
Enterprise Infrastructure / ISD / USC
UCC 174 - 213-821-5427

Attachment: pgp3DUKQUUiJ1.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to