On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:53:06 +0200 Maurilio Longo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes but inet.c is xharbour/harbour native code, log utils is as well, zlib and > pcrepos, on the contrary, are external programs/modules integrated into > xharbour, so they should separated first/even more. I don't think "native code" could be the reason why it is there. If it were, then we could as well dump most of the contrib there because most of them are xharbour native codes. I am thinking about separating basic and extended functionality whereby I classified internet/log (just for example) routines as belong to the later group. Anyway,things are of no matter to me. I don't have serious problem with the status-quo as of now. -- Andi ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
