Peter,

I have no knowledge of the subject but I trust your sense 100%.

Ron

On Apr 23, 2008, at 8:25 PM, Peter Rees wrote:

>
> There are updates required to gtwvt to restore the extended
> functionality that was lost when the harbour gt's were merged with  
> xharbour.
>
> Can I request that the standard gtwvt is NOT changed but that the
> enhanced version be incorporated into /contrib/wvtgui as a complete
> standalone gt - possibly even changing the name to gtwvx or something
> similar. This will make it easier to maintain compatibility of  
> standard
> gt's with Harbour.
>
> Thanks
>
> Peter
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save  
> $100.
> Use priority code J8TL2D2.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http:// 
> java.sun.com/javaone
> _______________________________________________
> xHarbour-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
xHarbour-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers

Reply via email to