Hi all, After: 2008-04-29 14:10 UTC+0700 Andi Jahja <harbour/AT/cbn/net/id>.
This is the optimum limit I can achive in order to have a "one-for-all" makefile construction. This should work for 6 compilers that have different compile/linking dialects. It should be easy if in future we will find another Compiler to be integrated for xHarbour (I have yet to try Intel C++). We cannot dump the library creation in one common file because the librarian way of generating lib may be far different from one to another(fe. Borland/DMC requires a response file for large library (RTL/DLL) while MsVC/PellesC/MinGW/OpenWatcom do not. Currently, if we add an OBJ dependency, we have to modify 2 files ie. common.mak and compile.mak. I've tried hard to make it one but no success so far. -- Andi ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ xHarbour-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
