Paul, I agree. But please, let's finalize this subject.
Ron On May 7, 2008, at 5:13 AM, Paul Tucker wrote: > > PMx> Viktor did some changes in Harbour which i think are usefull > also fr > PMx> xHarbour > > I haven't looked at his Maxrow/col changes - but I would be > inclined to go > the other way with xHarbour and correct for the one ct3 > incompatiblilty > brought up here before. > > If we actually have an issue with using MaxRow(.t.) when needed, or > MaxRow( SOME_CONSTANT ), and wish instead to introduce some other > function > to use for this, then we're really starting to split hairs. IMO. > > Paul > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save > $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http:// > java.sun.com/javaone > _______________________________________________ > xHarbour-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ xHarbour-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
