Paul,

Do you have any specifics on why would compile time be slower? My  
experience has been the opposite - I think this new make system is a  
great improvement.

Ron

On May 31, 2008, at 9:47 AM, Paul Tucker wrote:

>
>  PMx> Paul, are you working on GT?
>
> I am - and while I've been putting up with how things are, I must  
> say, I am
> severly annoyed that this make process was implemented.  The  
> compile time is
> astounding and is most of the reason this wasn't done the first  
> time it was
> brought up.
>
> I am also annoyed that the supposed 'generic' system now has paths  
> included
> with instructions that this should not be changed except on the local
> machine.  If the author truly wants this to be generic, please find  
> another
> way to do this so that I and every other developer doesn't have to  
> now edit
> this 'generic' file everytime a download is done.
>
> Paul
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> xHarbour-developers mailing list
> xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
xHarbour-developers mailing list
xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers

Reply via email to