Ron Pinkas escribió:
> Miguel,
>
> This is not a good resolution, as -W3 or more has nothing to do with
> this. I just reverted this change in the last few days. If we agree that
> unused variables warning should be broken down, then it should be
> properly done, f.e.
>
> -W2Locals -W2Statics -W2Globals -W2Blocks -W2All
>
> Or at very least:
>
> -W21 -W22 -W23 -W23 -W20
>
Possibly remove from -w2 W0004 is not a good idea, but if we can't remove it
we can't use warning level 2 because arise thousand of warnings.
There are more than 27 warning types. I think is better allow warnings with
-w[n]
and remove some warnings as other compilers works:
f.e.
-w2 -w-4
to activate warning level 2 and remove warning 4 (blocks)
or
The warn pragma lets you override specific -wxxx command-line options or check
Display Warnings. xxx is the three letter
or four-digit message identifier used by the command-line option.
FOR ME your idea is a good idea to solve the problem definitively
Best regards,
Miguel Angel Marchuet
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
xHarbour-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
