Persoinally, I fully agree.

Let us ask the floor :-)

--
Adi

On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:01:52 +0100
Miguel Angel Marchuet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Andi Jahja escribió:
> > Miguel,
> > 
> > Or we can temporarily provide old binary compatibility by changing:
> > 
> >> #ifndef HB_NO_PROFILER
> >>        ULONG     ulCalls;      /* profiler support */
> >>        ULONG     ulTime;       /* profiler support */
> >>        ULONG     ulRecurse;    /* profiler support */
> >> #endif
> > 
> > To:
> > 
> > #if ( !defined( HB_NO_PROFILER ) || defined ( OLD_FWH_BINARY ) )
> >     ULONG     ulCalls;      /* profiler support */
> >     ULONG     ulTime;       /* profiler support */
> >     ULONG     ulRecurse;    /* profiler support */
> > #endif
> > 
> > So, those who do not want to recompile FWH/3rd party, should compile
> > xHarbour with -DOLD_FWH_BINARY ...or whatever define constant you may
> > call it.
> 
> Better -HB_LEGACY_LEVEL instead of -DOLD_FWH_BINARY, similar use of it at
> Harbour and other places to preserve compatibility
> 
> 
> Do you agree ?
> 
> Best regards,
> Miguel Angel Marchuet



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
xHarbour-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers

Reply via email to