In all cases heap function are quicker than local ones. We are always speaking of windows platforms. MSDN explain then Local* functions will be replaced for Heap* for this reason.
you can read this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366723(VS.85).aspx Note: The local functions have greater overhead and provide fewer features than other memory management functions. New applications should use the heap functions unless documentation states that a local function should be used. For more information, see Global and Local Functions. Best regards, Miguel Angel Marchuet Andi Jahja escribió: > On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:41:19 +0100 > Miguel Angel Marchuet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> speed changes from 100s to 30s. > > 30s? I never reach that speed. "Heaps" works slower than "malloc" in my > case (?). ANyway, can you please post the full report of speedtst.exe? > > -- > Andi > > __________ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de firmas > de virus 3649 (20081128) __________ > > ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje. > http://www.eset.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ xHarbour-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
