On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Luiz Rafael Culik Guimaraes<l...@xharbour.com.br> wrote: >> >>> this changes in my opinion, is to make more incompatible the api for >>> developers >> >> No technical merit in these changes then? > > Im not discussing merit, but compatility. One os the changes, has break > hwgui ( the new hb_parv*/hb_storv*) > Now imaging how many 3rd parties has to have two version of same code due > this changes.
Look from another perspective: how many people were forced to fix the usage of hb_par*() with 2 or more arguments, which was broken by design and not GPF-safe. This change will probably engage 3rd-party RDD developers, so let them say. I have one simple RDD which inherits from DBF, and these simple changes are no problem to me. BTW I guess that most RDD developers already have 2 versions of code - for Harbour and for xHarbour. -- Ph. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
