Patrick, TAG and create a branch for ver 1.2.1, IMO.
Andi On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:07:35 +0200 "Patrick Mast, xHarbour" <patrick.m...@winfakt.com> wrote: > Hey Andi, > > I agree. Let me see how we can TAG this in SVN. > > Patrick > > > I am going to implement the use of common data types for xHarbour under > > both 32 and 64-bit environment. > > > > As we can see, the current SVN define (example): ULONG is unsigned long > > for 32/64-bit and it is very widely used. IMHO, we should replace all > > ULONG with HB_LONG for proper 64bit applications. But instead, I have > > prepared to use HB_SIZE in order to make it easy for synchronization > > with Harbour when needed :-) > > > > This will certainly cause regressions. > > > > As such, I hereby propose to release the current repo as 1.2.1 and start > > version 1.2.2. > > > > As I am not very familiar with the "cut-off" stuffs, I would like to ask > > a helping hand for this purpose. > > > > Thank you. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How fast is your code? 3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t know how their code performs in production. Find out how slow your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219672;13503038;z? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
