Hello, > So my final question is: > Are you interesting in taking current Harbour code and adding > xHarbour extensions which were not ported to Harbour core code > and you think are important just to keep base code for both > compilers as close as possible. In practice it would mean also > that well written 3-rd party code for both compilers is > compatible. I can help in many places though I hope that some > standalone contrib libraries can be ported by their authors > or at least active users.
Is this done in Harbour's or xHarbour's repository. Enrico, we can do this in a different branche, so we still have current code to work with as "stable", and new branch as "non stable" until that one gets stable. I'm all in favour of winning speed. Patrick ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
