Luiz,
Thanks for considering. What is it exactly you changed? What will be reverted?
Can you explain the change?
Patrick
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Rafael Culik <cul...@gmail.com> wrote:
Patrick i can keep the fix for init on new gcc and revert to not need pcode
change
Regards
Luiz
Em 10 de out de 2016 09:08, "Patrick Mast" < patrick.m...@xharbour.com
[patrick.m...@xharbour.com] > escreveu:
Hey Luiz,
If the changes are necessary or make xHarbour better, than we should keep the
changes.
It seems these changes need an increase of PCode level, right?
PCode increase is a serious matter in my opinion. All PRG’s in user’s code AND
3rd party products need to be recompiled. *IF* we can avoid it, I’m in favour.
Patrick
On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Rafael Culik < cul...@gmail.com
[cul...@gmail.com] > wrote:
Patrick, Enrico
Revert or keep changes?
Regards Luiz
2016-10-09 13:18 GMT-03:00 Enrico Maria Giordano < e.m.giord...@emagsoftware.it
[e.m.giord...@emagsoftware.it] > :
Il 09/10/2016 17:43, Rafael Culik ha scritto:
Patrick
Not need recompile ill revert changes today
Thank you, Luiz!
EMG
--
http://www.emagsoftware.it [http://www.emagsoftware.it]
http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic [http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic]
http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum [http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum]
http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg [http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
xHarbour-developers mailing list
xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
