On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 10:50 AM, Chad La Joie wrote:
That seems like it would be overkill. I use Tamino here at work and I would LOVE a better option. One of the problems that we have with Tamino is that it's a pretty big memory hog on our Linux systems.
This will probably be a problem with any XML database.
What is the current state of Xindice/dbXML? I have a list of suggestions for improvements but I don't want to clutter up the list right now while the project conversion is going on.
Fire away, the shape of 1.0 is set, but we need to really dig in and figure out how things will look for later revisions.
At 12:53 PM 1/14/2002, you wrote:Somtimes I read Avalon mailing-list, and I remember some proposition to use the avalon
framework in dbxml.
It's always plan ?
-- -------------------------------------------------------------- David "Dwayne" Bernard Freelance Developer (Java) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] \|/ http://dwayne.java-fan.com --o0O @.@ O0o-------------------------------------------------
Kimbro Staken XML Database Software, Consulting and Writing http://www.xmldatabases.org/
