I checked on Linux and it takes about 150 ms vs 16000 on the NT box. Same network... I will try it on a 98 box and see what happens. I will also be running the code on the Macs tomorrow and can see if I can figure out the times there. Any error checking or debug info we can turn on that might give us a hint?
Mark Tom Bradford wrote: > On Wednesday, March 6, 2002, at 03:08 PM, Mark J. Stang wrote: > > I did some timing tests and was able to discover that the first access > > of > > a > > collection was painfully slow on NT, haven't tried the Mac yet. I > > implemented > > a collection pool. The first access of the collection was taking 15 to > > 16 seconds > > on the NT machine. Subsequent accesses very fast. Did a little > > looking > > and > > registering the database is taking all the time 16303 ms. So that > > means > > any > > command-line tool will take at least 16000 ms. to run a command. Any > > idea > > why? I understand you don't have a NT box to work with... > > I'm guessing the delay is an erroneous lookup of some kind, possibly the > web server or ORB attempting to do a Reverse DNS and timing out. I'm > not sure why it would not work on one Mac and work on the other. I have > a G4 Powerbook and haven't had any problems of this nature. > Unfortunately, I only have limited ability to test on NT (Virtual PC on > the Mac) > > -- > Tom Bradford - http://www.tbradford.org > Architect - XQRL (XQuery Engine) - http://www.xqrl.com > Apache Xindice (Native XML Database) - http://xml.apache.org/xindice > Project Labrador (Web Services Framework) - http://notdotnet.org
