Sounds good to me. We could do intermediate releases through SourceForge and announce them here. How does that sound?
Mark Matt Liotta wrote: > I certainly don't mind if a separate CVS repository is setup and we work > with that until we are ready to integrate back with the main Xindice > tree. However, it would seem to be useful to share the changes we are > making as we make them with this list. If for nothing more than an extra > set of eyeballs. > > -Matt > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vanessa Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2002 8:24 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Xindice as a servlet? > > > > Mark J. Stang wrote: > > > > > Sure, what do you want to call it on SourceForge? > > > > I can't think of anything profound. The best I can come up with is > Xindice > > Embedded. Since it's not going to be a permanent project anyway, it > > probably > > doesn't matter much what it's called. > > > > Just so we're clear, looking at a post of yours from Jun 13th, am I > > correct > > that this is what we're planning to do? > > > > 1) define interfaces to the "core" of Xindice; > > 2) implement the XML:DB API on top of the Xindice core interface. > > > > Programmers who want to use Xindice embedded can code to the "core" > > interfaces, or to XML:DB, whichever they prefer. The XML:DB part has > to > > have > > the server components built-in, as per Kimbro's message, and then the > > network layer is gone. Et voila! an embedded Xindice package. > > > > Is that an accurate description of the project's purpose? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Vanessa > > > > > Mark > > > > > > Vanessa Williams wrote: > > > > > >> Are you willing to lead this thing, Mark? > > > -- > > > Mark J Stang > > > Software Architect > > > Cybershop Systems > > > > > > -- Mark J Stang Software Architect Cybershop Systems
begin:vcard n:Stang;Mark x-mozilla-html:TRUE adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fn:Mark Stang end:vcard
