On a general POV, I would like to take the opportunity of 2.0 for:
- moving the code into the 'src' directory - reformating it to adhere to the Apache conventions - correcting some package names (xindice.server.rpc but xindice.client.xmldb.xmlrpc)
-1 on package names. The xindice.server.rpc package has nothing to do with xmldb (well, at least to the user). I don't disagree with renaming the package entirely, but remember that the end goal is to have XML:DB, XML-RPC, and SOAP as available methods to directly access the server, and not just XML:DB so we should either have extensions (as mentioned in a previous thread) or some other package naming for XML-RPC and SOAP apart from XML:DB.
Makes sense. Though I still think that XML:DB should remain the primary way to access Xindice, we should work together with the xmldb group to extend the API and, if it doesn't work, make our own additions. But yes, it would be nice to have alternative ways of access.
Ciao,
-- Gianugo Rabellino
