There is another issue of 1.1 that may or may not create havoc with our current users: XMLObjects (or lack thereof). We need to add this back or create a viable replacement, if not for 1.1, but for sure a 1.2+ (keep in mind that this is what was originally planned to drive things such as triggers, etc.).
Do you have an idea of how many people is actually using the XMLObject code on 1.0? I didn't really find a good use case for them, and in my understanding almost nobody is using them ATM. I think that a much more useful feature would be adding support for BinayResources, so I'd rather work on that.
Anyway, I don't even know why they were removed, and how painful would be to bring them in again. Do you have any idea?
If we can manage to get into the "release often" way of things, we should not have a problem stepping the product up to the level that everyone wants (and needs) it to be. Do we vote on moving the XMLObject code back into the tree or create another solution entirely?
I'd like to have some good use cases for XMLObjects first, so that I can finally understand how they will be useful to the end user.
Ciao,
-- Gianugo Rabellino
