So now for the proposal: is it OK to you if I commit the Jetty support in CVS? We grow by 700KB, but we gain IMHO a hell of a lot in flexibility.
My opinion (since you asked for it...)
- no to commit Jetty into cvs (we don't have Tomcat in cvs, wo why having Jetty?)
- yes to support Jetty and even require developers to install it and use it for testing Xindice (I'm writing a nightly test and if we can have something easier than Tomcat, it would be great)
An installation howto for Jetty would be IMO sufficient.
But a great news, definitively
-Vladimir
-- Vladimir R. Bossicard Apache Xindice - http://xml.apache.org/xindice
