Vladimir R. Bossicard wrote:
:-)
org.apache.xnode implies (?) that xnode is an apache sub-project, which is not the case. Or am I wrong?
Not really, it might suggest it but it's not always like this (think org.apache.xpath).
the xindicex came from my idea to have a package separation between the core modules and the extensions ('x'). But it looks like everything will come under xindice.
The idea might be good, but I dislike the "xindicex" naming (though I understand that it's a quite standard way to name extensions). :-) I'd rather have o.a.x.extensions, o.a.x.components, o.a.x.modules, o.a.x.plugins or some other clever name we might come up with.
Ciao,
-- Gianugo
