> I looked at it and I think it is VERY misleading... I know that 100% code coverage doesn't mean well tested. But IMO 25% is not "well covered"
> Look at any class in the org.apache.xindice.server.rpc.messages > package. 0% coverage. However, these classes are entry classes to the RPC > layer and hence ARE used... "Used" doesn't mean "tested". The code coverage only reports tested classes (however I only run the unit tests and not the integraion tests. So the numbers are definitively (a little bit) higher). -Vladimir -- Vladimir R. Bossicard Apache Xindice - http://xml.apache.org/xindice
