pursuant to that, what's the take on the dependency to forehead?
when i took out the forehead stuff out of the batch scripts, it was much happier.
i don't know much about forehead, so i'm not sure which problem it's trying to solve.


thanks in advance for any info,

-a

Kevin Ross wrote:

Aadi, if you find anything wrong and want to fix it, GREAT!  Just file
the bug under 1.1 and include the patch.  I'll review it ASAP.

-Kevin


-----Original Message-----
From: Mailing Lists (Aadi) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 11:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: xindice.bat / xindice.sh scripts broken in CVS ?


Vladimir R. Bossicard wrote:



i found a number of issues, but the key one preventing me from


starting

the server is :




0) please note EVERY issue you found, not only the more severe ones.



absolutely. i just wanted to get to a reasonable stopping point before i

listed issues and submitted patches.



1) Should I define a new "release" bugzilla category to order these


bugs?


i don't know much about how apache works, but shouldn't we be tagging issues against a milestone?



2) Kevin, [without lecturing you] I would create nightly releases


(simply put


them into your cvs.apache account, no need to advertise them). It's


very likely


that the first releases will not work and having multiple releases


gives plenty


of time to spot/fix the problems.

3) How can a user migrate the data/indexes from 1.0 to 1.1? Are the


tbls


compatible? I don't know if this is an issue and it's maybe trivial,


but I


haven't seen any documentation on this topic.

-Vladimir





thanks in advance,

-a






Reply via email to