Hi, The discussion about 1.1 indexing made me wonder if there is something that I am doing wrong, or if there is a known bug with indexing and performance in the 1.1 code.
I have a database with ~50mb of data. ~600 xml files, which took about 5 seconds to respond to a query in 1.0, and now is taking 115 seconds with 1.1. The data was reloaded from scratch. This procedure takes about 1.5 hours. #!/bin/sh xindice delete_collection -l -c /db/neurosys/data -n ccblab xindice add_collection -l -c /db/neurosys/data -n ccblab xindice add_indexer -l -c /db/neurosys/data/ccblab -n starE -p "*" xindice add_indexer -l -c /db/neurosys/data/ccblab -n starA -p "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" # neither add multiple nor import seem to work, so... for file in ccblab/* do name=`echo $file | sed "s/ccblab\///"` CMD="xindice ad -l -c /db/neurosys/ccblab -f $file -n $name" echo "$CMD" $CMD done after executing the above script ls -l ./db/neurosys/ccblab -rw-r--r-- 1 wwwrun nogroup 53489664 Jun 9 13:29 ccblab.tbl -rw-r--r-- 1 wwwrun nogroup 243196928 Jun 9 13:29 starA.idx -rw-r--r-- 1 wwwrun nogroup 6144 Jun 9 13:29 starE.idx xindice xpath -l -c /db/neurosys/ccblab -q "/XSIL/[EMAIL PROTECTED]'system']" (this takes 115 seconds) Any ideas? Are the "star" queries still ok? Cheers, Gary ------------------------------------------------------ Gary Orser , (406) 994-6451, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Montana State University Center for Computational Biology 1 Lewis Hall, Bozeman MT, 59717
