Kevin O'Neill wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:38:12 -0400, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Kimbro Staken wrote:
Documentation would take a couple hours to write, but there's no point
if the API is going to be considered private.
Can it be win-win situation?
1. Fix the bugs
2. Write the documentation
Sure, we just have to decide if we want to maintain compatibility between . point versions (eg 1.1 -> 1.2)
Did I miss something? 1.1 is not released yet! :)
With the exception of one beta version. And given the fact that RPC appeared only in version 1.1, which is not released yet, I'd say it's the best time to fix outstanding bugs. Talks about supporting or changing RPC XML format in 1.2 I think should happen when we reach this point, i.e. we release 1.1 and there is a need to change format for 1.2. Makes sense?
and how we handle bugs that are introduced by the packet format.
Fix'em while it's not too late! ;-)
Vadim
