SteX wrote:
Hi Vadim,
thank you so much for the sudden answer. It doesn't matter if I created
a wrong patch. The important thing is the coherence of the information!
I know I made you notice a sislly thing, but I hope that this little help
could have been useful! ;-P
Yes, it was useful. Thanks.
Hope to help you more
Patches are welcome anytime, especially bug fixes, so don't hesitate to send a patch if you have one :-)
Vadim
Regards
SteX
PS: I have followed the ML so that I found your patch, thanks again
FebruaryHi guys, sorry for the stupid thing I would like to report, but I found out a probable error in the following page:
http://xml.apache.org/xindice/news.html
if the order of the event is correct the first one should refer to "5
2004" not "5 February 2003"; so I decided to create a patch (in attachment) to be applied on the file:
patch -p1 xindice/news.html < file.patch1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/cygdrive/d/cygwin1/sviluppo]$ ls -la total 10073 drwxr-xr-x+ 6 smelchio mkgroup- 4096 Jul 7 11:04 . drwxrwxrwx+ 10 smelchio mkgroup- 4096 Jun 3 09:11 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 smelchio mkgroup- 37910 Jul 7 11:05 file.patch1 drwxr-xr-x+ 2 smelchio mkgroup- 0 Jul 7 10:59 nuovo drwxr-xr-x+ 2 smelchio mkgroup- 0 Jul 7 11:05 xindice drwxr-xr-x+ 8 smelchio mkgroup- 4096 Jun 29 09:03 xindice-1.1b4
I hope it helps ;-P
Hi SteX,
It was nice for you to provide a patch. But, couple of problems are preventing from applying it :-)
First, do not patch HTML files. HTML files are generated from the XML files in the xml-xindice/src/documentation/... directory by forrest [1].
And second, it seems that almost each line in the file has been changed,
which is probably due to difference in line endings.
Anyway, I committed the fix to the news.xml in the CVS, you can check here [2]. Thanks for spotting this typo :-)
Vadim
[1] http://forrest.apache.org/
[2] http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-xindice/src/documentation/content/xdocs/news.xml?rev=1.12&view=markup
