+1
Todd
On 5/11/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Todd Byrne wrote:
> As far as I know you can set source level to 1.5 and still compile for
> 1.4 JVMs.
I don't think it works this way?
Gmail - [VOTE] Minimum Java
Version<?auth=DQAAAHcAAABtTVhQqxbmJG-ALQ4EG-gL9I8fmM2HpSTs9YyguiPFgGbPYU43KFCHnuEHTzD1Xpfq74rq8Dy329HeuwI8k-xqCP20zRdYuvauTRlE8YkGiZEaUE4ZTuASPlafGK9oaulipWLB6jOMemaVAKuzW8YlY9ijOAk85yHGvbrPISR4wQ>
compile.javac.target=1.4
compile.javac.source=1.5
compile-src:
[javac] javac: source release 1.5 requires target release 1.5
> All of the generics are backwards compatible. I have looked
> through the build.properties file and I don't think it would me more
> then a few changes to it and the build.xml.
First you would have to determine what is the platform currently in used
by the
user base :) Only after that decision could be made.
Anyway, getting back on-topic, what is your vote on moving to 1.4? You can
vote
one of 0 (don't care), +1 (yes), -1 (no, because: ...).
Vadim
> Todd
>
>
>
> On 5/10/07, *Vadim Gritsenko* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> Todd Byrne wrote:
> > Why not 1.5?
> >
> > 1.5 feature set is immense.
> >
> > Any compiling reason not to move to at least that?
>
> I know I need Java 1.4 features immediately, so I want to make this
> switch right
> now for Xindice 1.2.
>
> Personally I'd like to avoid jumping to 1.5 without any released
> Xindice version
> in between, so I would suggest going to Java 1.5 in Xindice 1.3 time
> frame.
> However, if you ready to do the leg work, and if you have good
> arguments for
> doing this sooner, you can certainly start discussion about it.
>
> Vadim
