Thanks for the quick reply. Note the follow up questions below...

-----Original Message-----
From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:20 PM
To: xindice-users@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving from Xindice 1.0 -> 1.1


Kurt Kavanaugh wrote:

>I am moving from 1.0 to 1.1. I am not concerned with backward 
>compatibility.... that much. I am however concerned with getting up and 
>running and understanding the new packaging and configuration elements.
>
>I have the server up and running, in theory, by installing the war file...
>
>http://cvs.apache.org/dist/xindice/b2/xindice-1.1b2.war
>
>Under tomcat 4.1.27
>
>My db is present and accounted for. I am using jdk 1.4.1.
>
>My question is this... where has the bin gone? to administer and test from the 
>command line. What are the other pieces?
>

war distribution does not has xindice command line tool. 

Understood. So all admin is done through exercising a set of java api's? And 
these java api's are javadoc'd where?

Currently, you can download CVS and run xindice tools from there connecting to 
your 
xindice instance runnign in tomcat.

You mean currently you can download cvs, use ant to build the bin tools. the 
resulting tools then know how to converse
with tomcat on port 8080 vs 4080 and use XML-RPC vs CORBA.

>Do I have to use cvs to access and build the bin dir and supporting characters?
>  
>

As of today - yes.


>Before the client needed the xindice.jar and xmldb.jar. I assume it is now the 
>xindice-1.1b2.jar? Correct?
>  
>

It might need jars from java/lib directory

Understood. I was trying to highlight the delta between what is standard and 
what is xindice specific.


>Port binding used to be 4080. Now it's the standard tomcat port?
>  
>

Now it's tomcat port, whatever you configured. Default tomcat's port is 8080


>Any help in understanding the packaging and configuration aspects of the 1.1 
>environment vs the 1.0 would be helpful.
>

1.1 is beta, so packaging is not final, improvements still can be done.

Understood. Perhaps I could be of help here...

Vadim


Reply via email to