Bent Andre Solheim wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 9. september 2003 14:17
To: xindice-users@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Xindice 1.1b2 stability, reliability and installation.
Bent Andre Solheim wrote:
Hi users and developers,
I checked out Xindice 1.1b from CVS using the build-1_1_b2 tag. Was unable to make it work properly. I then checked the working version
from CVS out and replaced the xindice-1.1.b2.jar from the b2 version
with the new one both on the server and on the commandline tool. Everything appears to be ok.There is no 1.1b2 release. There is 1.1b1 (see http://xml.apache.org/xindice/download.cgi), and there is current CVS which is 1.1b2-dev
...
There is a 1.1b2 tag in CVS.
There is might be a tag, yes, but no official release "1.1b2" has ever been made, to the best of my knowledge.
I checked out using this. Building went fine, but I was unable to make it work properly.
I know for sure that current CVS version works for me. You can update your checkout using:
cvs -q -z3 update -PdA
The download page has
changed since I checked out, I think. Untill recently, the download page
only contained the 1.0 version, if I am not mistaken.
No, you are not, yes, it has been changed :) ...
But back to my original question; do you have any opinion on how stable
Xindice is? Which release is the most stable? Can you recommend it in a
production environment?
I don't have answer on this, as I have not used 1.0 version. I'm using 1.1 CVS lightly, don't have issues with it, but I don't have your requirements also. I'd recommend you to test current CVS as it will be candidate for the next beta (1.1b2), and, eventually, 1.1 final release.
Vadim
