> >>>Hi users and developers, > >>> > >>>I checked out Xindice 1.1b from CVS using the build-1_1_b2 tag. Was > >>>unable to make it work properly. I then checked the > working version > >>> > >>> > >>>from CVS out and replaced the xindice-1.1.b2.jar from the > b2 version > >> > >> > >>>with the new one both on the server and on the commandline tool. > >>>Everything appears to be ok. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>There is no 1.1b2 release. There is 1.1b1 (see > >>http://xml.apache.org/xindice/download.cgi), and there is > current CVS > >>which is 1.1b2-dev > >>... > >> > >> > > > >There is a 1.1b2 tag in CVS. > > > > There is might be a tag, yes, but no official release "1.1b2" > has ever > been made, to the best of my knowledge. > > > >I checked out using this. Building went > >fine, but I was unable to make it work properly. > > > > I know for sure that current CVS version works for me. You can update > your checkout using: > cvs -q -z3 update -PdA > > > >The download page has > >changed since I checked out, I think. Untill recently, the download > >page only contained the 1.0 version, if I am not mistaken. > > > > > > No, you are not, yes, it has been changed :) > ... > > > >But back to my original question; do you have any opinion on > how stable > >Xindice is? Which release is the most stable? Can you > recommend it in a > >production environment? > > > > > > I don't have answer on this, as I have not used 1.0 version. > I'm using > 1.1 CVS lightly, don't have issues with it, but I don't have your > requirements also. I'd recommend you to test current CVS as > it will be > candidate for the next beta (1.1b2), and, eventually, 1.1 > final release. > > Vadim >
Thank you for your answer, Vadim. I will continue testing the 1.1b2dev and will hopefully be able to contribute some bug files / bug-fixes as testing progresses. best regards Bent
