Veniamin Fichin wrote:
Not sure if this is a bug, but.
So that was not a bug, but my misunderstranding of documentation. It has an example for index addition where it says to use "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" pattern, but as far as I can tell now, it should be "rock/@hard" or "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" or...
With these changes my XPathes works, resulting in not so huge performance improvements; it's about a couple of percents. Another test showed me that queries on collection without indexes work even faster that with them! For example, I used 10 iterations to test and received these milliseconds:
index with pattern /[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4000 3672 3485 3422 3406 3453 3453 3578 3547 3421 ---- 3543,7
index with pattern /Movie/@id 3985 3640 3500 4343 4875 3625 3797 3718 3375 3281 ---- 3813,9
no index 3922 3485 3532 3438 3391 3484 3484 3328 3266 3250 ---- 3458 // fastest result??
I'm sure I'm doing something stupid.
-- Veniamin Fichin
