On Feb 5, 2008 8:11 AM, Michael Gratton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 19:10 -0500, Natalia Shilenkova wrote: > > I would recommend to check indexer configuration first, to make sure > > that indexer type and pattern are correct. > > Ahh, thanks for that. All the indexes were using ValueIndexer when some > should have been using NameIndexer. > > I guess I missed it because the old indexer was split up back when 0.9 > was released. I wonder why that wasn't a problem with 1.0-rc1? Looking > back at that old instance's configuration, the indexes all used > ValueIndexer as well. Odd. > > Anyway, thanks for you help. Should I put something on the wiki about > it? Does anyone use 0.9/1.0 any more?
You're welcome and please feel free to add any information you consider useful to the wiki. Any kind of documentation is greatly appreciated. Even if no one uses old version anymore it could help troubleshooting index problems. Regards, Natalia
