On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:27:53 -0500 Stewart Whitehouse <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 19:32 -0500, Jan Ditzian wrote: > > I am using xlog but I find that data entry is slow. I frequently > > type faster than the characters enter, and when i click on date or > > time, it takes a while to populate the field. I have over 25000 > > entries. > Jan, > I am experiencing the same problem with xlog 1.7. I never had the > problem with prior releases. Also my log has less than 100 entries. > Stew ke4yh > > Keep your logs small, open and close them as you need them, xlog was designed to work this way. Using a large log with 25000 QSO's will only work with database based logging programs. There are couple linux logbook programs that work this was, but I think there are more benefits to using text based logs. > > > _______________________________________________ > Xlog-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/xlog-discussion Regards, -- Joop Stakenborg <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Xlog-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/xlog-discussion
