On 01-Mar-2001 Maris Upesleja wrote:
> hello !
> 
> I'm just a newbie with a linux and Xmail (im running a slackware 7.1), 
> so I have a little Q:
> is it possible with X-mail to set up e-mail forwarding w/o any
> specially written pre-processing stuff ?
> For example, if I have user
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and somebody sends him a message,
> can it be forwarded from xmail server to something
> like [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> while still keeping a copy in users' mailbox ?

Yep, read the doc.


> 
> I can imagine a workaround - say to do little mess with a mailing lists,
> but thats not fun !  Maybe there are any other ways to do this ?
> 
> There is a multiple POP collecting engine (configured by pop3links.tab),
> but as it seems to me, there is not forwarding stuff ! 
> If it is not implemented, maybe author may consider adding also something
> like 
> fwdlinks.tab just for ease.
> OK I understand that maybe I am too dissolute as a moderate NT admin, but I
> hope
> you will understand my point.
> 
> Anyway Xmail is great, I like it very much and hope that someday it will
> have all the advanced features implemented (like Mdaemon v3.5 for instance
>:-)

XMail has all the features needed by 95% of users and is about 300Kb.
To add features needed by the 5% of users XMail will become more than 1Mb and
the 95% of users will be bloated by features they don't need.
One could say "Why to not use macro definitions to includes modules, like
sendmail ?".
I answer by saying that sendmail code is like sh*t filled of #ifdef ... that
makes the code bloated and difficult to understand and to bug fix.
I hope You understand my view of what XMail should be for me.




- Davide

Reply via email to