What is being missed here is the issue is not output format, but input content management. Ok, so you want RTF, ok...
http://www.codenoevil.com/Xmail/xmail.rtf all that took was changing two items in the single command line command it took to create that. Ladies and Gentlemen, DocBook is the way for management, we can see that. As for output, the format is the limit. Oh yeah, I did up a HTML frames version too: http://www.codenoevil.com/Xmail/frames.htm but do pardon the broken image links for now. I didn't feel like editing the .js file to add images/ to each image filename ('course when we roll this out, that'll be a no-brainer). Davide, let's get the CVS setup and let me plop some file in and let's get going. -dave --- Davide Libenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 3 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > The present documentation is a terrible struggle > to use for these reasons, > > as well as grammer, spelling, and other general > english language concerns. > > You should have seen it two years ago :) > > Everyone agree on RTF ? > > > > > - Davide > > ===== ---- David B. Bitton [EMAIL PROTECTED] We will overcome. http://www.libertyunites.org __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
