On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, CLEMENT Francis wrote: > Simply because, when not using 'smartdnshost' xmail use its own = > resolver ... > It seems, in some situations (not completely defined yet) the xmail = > resolver > don't get the good responses that you have at same time with dig or > nslookup... > This problem exist on *nix and win32 platforms (so I don't think os > dependant) ... > > I think that, except if xmail resolver is completely retested, any = > xmail > admin/user should force xmail to use the smartdnshost, as at 99% you = > have > your local dns ou can use your isp dns ... > Or simple Davide to remove xmail internal resolver and force usage of > smartdnshost in future version ? > IMO, this will reduce xmail code to maintain ;-) and why trying to redo = > not > directly mail related job then other programs allready do from years = > ago ... > Xmail is one of the best as an mta like bind is for dns ...
There was an issue that arised with special DNS configurations, that has been fixed in 1.18 - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
