On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Tracy wrote: > I'm looking at extending a few of the DNS functions for things I want to > check on incoming connections and mails, and I was wondering if there's any > particular reason that NS and MX records were the only things cached > locally by Xmail? Specifically I was thinking about A and PTR records - was > there some particular reason for not caching those results (too many, > typically low TTL, something else)? Or did it just burden the file system > too much? Or something else? > > I'd rather avoid the round trip time for DNS queries if I can, but if > there's some overriding reason here, I'll just go straight to the wire for > A and PTR queries....
You don't need to do that. XMail uses the existing OS infrastrcture for A and PTR queries, that is automatically cached by DNS server closer to you. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
