On Friday 28 May 2004 11:59 am, Liron Newman wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Is anyone else interested it this scheme? Am I just being one of > >Davide's PITA people? Davide? Supporters? Detractors? Please let me know. > > > >I promise if I get voted down, I'll shut-up about it (I can hear Davide > >thinking: '...voted? Who said anything about xmail being a democracy?' ;) > > ). > > I'm for it, because I sometimes want to use programs that were'nt meant > to be filters as filters, and they use a "-param=filename" syntax, so I > need to create a wrapper app for them, which stinks for obvious > performance reasons.
Good point. > > However, if it causes any kind of trouble, I can live without it. Yeah, I think we can all agree on that. Oh by the way, total number of xmail cpp lines: before my patch: 49,684 with my patch: 49,538 xmail source is 146 lines _smaller_ with my patch applied. Current vote: For: 2 Against: 1 Undecided: 29,856 ;) Aloha => Beau; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
