Well I feel like a dumb*** sorry guys :) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Healy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 4:10 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: IP Address notation in configuration files
> What limits? Any valid mask you can specify with a mask can be specified > with the "shorthand" form. > > Bill > > > >---------- > >From: Mike Harrington[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 10:45 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: [xmail] IP Address notation in configuration files > > > >Hi, > > > >This is for Davide or anyone else who can give me a reason. Why do some > >configuration files use a standard subnet mask when setting up a block of IP > >addresses (e.g. "123.123.123.0" [TAB] "255.255.255.0") and others require > >you to use the shorthand notation (e.g. "123.123.123.0/24"). Considering > >the obvious limits with the shorthand notation, I would think requiring an > >IP address with a seperate subnet mask throughout the configuration files > >would be a much better way to go. > > > >-Mike > > > >- > >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > >the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
