SpamAssassin with all tests enabled is the winner hands down. There are no others that compare.
Most who say SA can be beat by product xxx did not try SA with everything enabled... they only had the offline tests enabled, or worse, messed with the defaults thinking they were smarter than the development team. Outside of that, I've seen best results from CloudMark's products. They're the folks behind the Razor2 database. It works quite well. If you are looking for just Bayes based systems... take a peek at SourceForge.net. I know of two other bayes anti-spam systems on there. But they all suffer from Bayes poisoning tactics (fill an email up with non-spammy words to get past). SA doesn't suffer from this as Bayes is just one facet of its system. ------------------------------------------------------------ Jason J Ellingson Technical Consultant 615.301.1682 : nashville 612.605.1132 : minneapolis www.ellingson.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Manny Fulgencio Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos Jason, Thanks a lot for this info. How about for anti-spam. What commercial package would you recommend other than Spamassassin? Regards, Manny - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
