[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote on Wednesday, March 02, 2005 6:41 AM: > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=3DF6nke Ruempler wrote: >=20 >> Hi Davide, >> =3D20 >> I don't know how effective SMTP thread throtteling is to control the >> server's load. I set it to 7 and became 421 very fast although there >> were not 7 threads. Now it set it to twenty but if 20 mails arrive >> parallel at the server it could still overload (smtp filter >> timeouts). =3D20 I saw a kewl feature in sendmail (yes - it's ugly = ;-) >> ). If the system load average goes over X, sendmail sends "421 too >> busy". Maybe that is a better way than throtteling the maxiumum >> threads?!=20 >=20 > Why would you set the max SMTP threads to 7?? Remember, on > the contrary of=3D > =3D20 > the SMAIL ones, the SMTP ones are not pre-allocated. Sorry, > but this goes=3D > =3D20 > in /dev/null ;)
Mhm, could you explain that more exactly? I guessed if I set max-threads to 7 XMail can receive 7 mails simultaneously. But it doesn't seem to work this way ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
