Are you using my Python filter or writing your own? I tested with file attachments, and it caught them quite well, but that was all I had to test with. Improvements are welcome.
John Kielkopf wrote: > Anyone else scanning mail with ClamAV? > > With just telling ClamAV to scan the "message file" supplied by Xmail, > It'll miss a number of the test from http://www.webmail.us/testvirus > > If I build a new temp file to scan doing the following: > - Strip "<<MAIL-DATA>> X-ClamAV-Scan: clean > X-ClamAV-Scan: clean > Received-SPF: unknown ([69.30.125.51]: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED] uses > unknown mechanism: no SPF record)" and everything before > - Add a "Return-Path: <xxx>" header to the top. > - Detect and fix a bad EOH (no double "CRLF" before the start of the > message body) > > I can then get ClamAV to pass all of the tests that contain a virus. > (#24 and #24 get past, but they contain no virus). > > Is it possible to get ClamAV to hit the target without all of this? I'd > like to avoid the overhead of building a new file every time I want to > scan it. > > Thanks, > --John > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
