Bill Healy wrote:

>The majority of the messages my servers turn away are pure spam and most
>are addressed to accounts that have never existed, so it's not like the
>addresses have been harvested from someone's infected computer. It's
>become common now to just try long lists of common names @domain.com to
>try and get spam through.
>
>Here's a log extract from one of my scanning servers from today, none of
>the unknown accounts ever existed, but they did manage to guess one
>correct address and the message was queued, but later deleted when it
>was scanned and found to be spam.
>
>Dec 30 14:10:17 gateway sendmail[25325]: jBUMAAkD025325:
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown
>Dec 30 14:10:17 gateway sendmail[25325]: jBUMAAkD025325:
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown
>
Yes, and checking that the rcpt. is valid definitely relieves a good 
deal of load from your antivirus/spam filters... but, unless the sender 
of these attempted spams is a valid -- but forged -- address,  a bounce 
back message likely wouldn't hit spamcops trap and trigger a listing.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to