On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, CLEMENT Francis wrote: > As they state that this could be a problem with some anti-spam = > softwares, > are they true saying this is a RFC technical violation ? > Or dnsreport don't take in account another paragraph or rfc about smtp = > MD5 > auth ? > > In case dnsreport statement is true, is there a alternative 'greeting > response' format that will do both conformence to referenced rfc's and = > md5 > auth ? > > You opinion ?
They're right. In theory the first token in the greeting should be the host name. CRAM-MD5 would not be affected since the random key lies inside <>. Can be fixed w/out any probs. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
