Jeffrey Laramie wrote: > On Tuesday 20 February 2007 12:32, Davide Libenzi wrote: > >> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Dave Henderson wrote: >> >>> Davide, >>> Thanks for your reply. I can see your points. It was just a >>> question I had as it seems alot of the daemons I use, use the apache >>> style or a single config file method. The daemons also don't lock the >>> files when reading them, they just read them upon startup (of course) and >>> re-read them automatically within a certain period of time (to check for >>> any changes made to them). I suppose both styles have their strengths >>> and weaknesses. In either case, thanks for the reply. >>> >> I'm not an heavy Apache user (actually, I use thttpd ;) but IIRC Apache is >> going in the exact opposite direction (splitting configs). >> > > In recent openSUSE releases httpd.conf is nothing more than comments and > Include statements. All the actual configuration is divided up amongst the > Included config files and directories. Most of the user configuration is in > vhost containers that each have a vhostname.conf file in the vhosts.d > directory. It takes a little getting used to but the design is actually very > nice once you see how it works. > > Jeff > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
That's what my apache (and UnrealIRCd) config looks like too. But this will definately make updates from the CONTROL interface much harder, probably impossible for Davide. I agree with Francis Clement that it would be easier if most of the current command-line options were in the SERVER.tab or some other config file. Ivo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
