>-----Message d'origine----- >De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi >Envoy=E9 : mardi 17 avril 2007 01:53 >=C0 : [email protected] >Objet : [xmail] Re: 1.25-pre06 ... > > >On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote: > >> On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Rob Arends wrote: >>=20 >> > Davide, >> > I have had to turn on smartdnshost again. >> >=20 >> > After having an error-free run for quite a while, this=20 >morning I see errors. >> > Investigation shows. >> >=20 >> > Issue 1: >> > --------- >> > -> Partial Bounce email content: >> > (I've swapped @ for *) >> >=20 >> > ID: <S347B1> >> > Mail From: <stkilda*nzn.com.au> >> > Rcpt To: <sjellis*optusnet.com.au> >> > Server: <www.optusnet.com.au> [211.29.132.105] >> >=20 >> > ErrCode =3D -217 >> > ErrString =3D Error connecting to remote address > >And, BTW, "www.optusnet.com.au" is *NOT* the A record. If=20
Yes it is : set type=3Da optusnet.com.au Nom=A0: optusnet.com.au Address: 211.29.132.105 set type=3Dptr 211.29.132.105 105.132.29.211.in-addr.arpa name =3D www.optusnet.com.au >XMail would have=20 >tried the A record, you should have seen "optusnet.com.au" in there. > So, the questions are : - In this case specific 'bad name reported in the error', how xmail get (perhabs not its decision ?) and report www.optusnet.com.au as the name = and not optusnet.com.au as it should be ? =20 - And this does not response to the more general question, Why the A ip address used here and not the existing MX entries (even if only one and eventually busy, unreachable, ...) Any possibility to 'trace' xmail dns stack and algo in a log to see = then and why the decision to use the A is taken ? (tcp dump are not suffisent here as whe could not see xmail decision on = dns responses) Francis > > >- Davide > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
