Hey Jeff

Seams I did not understood all of your dns server setup.
I thinked you dns only returned a list of NS for the domains it is
autoritive.
Sorry :)

Another possibility :) :
Just in case there is a problem with natted loop-back at monowall =
router

I suppose you have this physical hardware setup (correct if wrong) :

Internet <-> MonoWall <-> 'autoritive only' dns server ;) / xmail =
server

Is it this ?

Does the interface between Monowall and dns/xmail server do NAT ?

If NATTED servers :

What does a dig from the dns/xmail server to itself using its internal =
ip
address ?
 dig @internal-dns-server-ip-address trikorausa.com +trace

And a dig from the xmail server using the External ip address of the =
dns
server (so the Monowall external ip) ?
 dig @monowall-external-internet-ip trikorausa.com +trace

Francis




-----Message d'origine-----
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Jeff Buehler
Envoy=E9 : jeudi 21 f=E9vrier 2008 17:12
=C0 : [email protected]
Objet : [xmail] Re: FreeBSD problem (similar to NetBSD problem report =
ed
earlier?)


I should also clarify, as you mention users, that none of this has=20
anything to do with users on a LAN.  This is a hosting server providing =

web services and email, along with some other functionality.  The issue =

at question is how this particular server sees domains that are =
external=20
to it.  It has no way of knowing about yahoo.com or hotmail.com without =

a name server that provides recursive lookups, so I have assigned it a=20
name server that does.  It just so happens that in the case of this one =

domain (trikorausa.com) this server provides the authoritative DNS (A=20
records, MX records, etc.).  There is no way (that I know about) for me =

to have it query itself just for domains it knows about, then query=20
external dns for everything else.

Thanks again,
Jeff

Jeff Buehler wrote:
> Hi Clement -
>
> Perhaps I am using the wrong semantics, or perhaps I am not =
completely=20
> understanding you, or possibly I am doing something wrong (even =
thought=20
> I have been doing it this way more or less for about 10 years!).  =
This=20
> server provides (what I understand to be) true authoritative name=20
> resolution for about 60 domains and ONLY those 60 domains, but =
provides=20
> no recursive lookups nor any caching - no systems on the LAN query =
it,=20
> or any other server I provide locally, for DNS resolution.  It is =
simply=20
> queried by external caching DNS servers on the net for name =
resolution=20
> of a small number of domains.  I do provide complete zone content for =

> these domains, but not for other domains such as yahoo.com =
(obviously)=20
> which need to be queried elsewhere as no caching is being done.
>
> My understanding is that a DNS server generally should not provide=20
> recursive lookups and caching while also providing authoritative=20
> resolution of domains for security reasons.  This at least is a=20
> recommendation made by Dan Bernstein (author of Tiny DNS) and makes=20
> sense to me - Bind and MS systems allow it, but it is probably not a=20
> good idea.
>
> Am I missing something?  Thanks for your input ...
>
> Jeff
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to