On Thursday, September 04, 2008 4:22 AM, Davide Libenzi wrote: >On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
>> Davide, just out of curiosity. >> >> Regarding the LF on disk vs CRLF in the SMTP protocol: >> >> Could you have read the file and converted LF->CRLF on the fly while sending >> the TCP data? >This is what I do now, for Unixes. Windows messages gets sent vanilla. Oh ok, I thought the new tmp folder was to create the CRLF version so you could just sendfile(). I must have mis read. I think I assumed that: Davide: "This avoided creating extra copies of the message file during the SMAIL processing." Was related to the next sentence: Davide: "In order to shove an extra file copy during the processing,..." But see it only relates to: Davide: "...when it comes to SMAIL local delivery." As opposed to remote delivery. Did I get it right now? >> Or does that create a performance hit that is unacceptable? >A simple sendfile() (for Linux) is going to be faster, that's sure. I'm >pretty darn sure that nobody will notice the difference. Yeah I thought so. >- Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
